Wednesday, November 27, 2019

How to Remember Dates for a Test - Memorization

How to Remember Dates for a Test - Memorization Dates are often difficult to remember because they seem so random and obscure unless we can relate them to something specific. For instance, the  American Civil War  started in 1861, but unless you have a strong interest in the specific timeline of the war, there is nothing special about the starting date that separates that date from any other. What makes 1861 stand apart from 1863 or 1851? Sometimes it can be as simple as leaving off the first two digits. If you are studying a particular time period, you already know what century in which the events take place. Even though it might not seem like it, breaking it down to just two numbers can make memorization much easier. You can associate those numbers with something like the number of a favorite athlete. If that doesn’t work, there are a few other tricks. When trying to memorize a date, students can really benefit from a  mnemonic system  (memory technique) to help them recall the right numbers in the right order. For memorizing dates it might be helpful to borrow a practice from the London Cockneys. A Cockney is an inhabitant of the East End of London, England. Cockneys have an old tradition of using  rhyming slang  as a secret language, of sorts. The tradition originated centuries ago, and it was used by Londons thieves, traders, entertainers, and other members from the lower strata of society. In Cockney slang, Can you believe it?  becomes  Can you Adam and Eve it? More examples: Whistle and flute suitWhite mice iceTom Hanks thanksTrouble and strife wife Remembering Dates We can use the same method to remember dates. Simply think of a term that rhymes with your date. Make sure your rhyme is a little silly and that it paints a strong picture in your head. You can leave off the century, so that 1861, the starting date for the Civil War, becomes 61. Example: 61 Sticky gun Imagine a Civil War soldier struggling with a gun that has been covered with honey. It may sound silly, but it works! More Examples: 1773 was the date of the Boston Tea Party. To remember this, you could think: 73 Heavenly tea You can just picture protesters sipping lovely cups of tea right before tossing them in the water. 1783 marks the end of the Revolutionary War. 83 Ladies bee For this image, think of several women sitting on a quilt and celebrating by stitching a red, white and blue quilt. The most important element of this method is to come up with a great, amusing image. The funnier it is, the more memorable it will be. If possible, come up with a little story to connect all your mental images. If you have trouble coming up with a rhyme or have a lot of connected information to remember, you could set the information to a song. If you are musically inclined, you could make up your own song. More often it is easier to replace the words to a song you already know well.

Saturday, November 23, 2019

Progressivism and its Predecessors essays

Progressivism and its Predecessors essays Progressivism, Jacksonianism, and Jeffersonianism were all ideals that ran on the platform of a government for the people. In line with this central platform, all three ideals opposed big business, supported social reform, and were discriminatory in one way or another. These policies were different however in the governments role in how to combat certain evils. Progressivism, Jeffersonianism, and Jacksonianism all strongly opposed big businesses. They felt that the monopolists would to corrupt the government if given the chance to. Roosevelt represented progressivism in calling for the destruction of large trusts that tried to corrupt the government. Jackson and the Democrats fought for personal rights against government and big business but did so less avidly than in Roosevelts time because of the lack of urgency. Jackson did not face the industrialists that Roosevelt was forced to face. Jefferson didnt have to face the fierce industrialists that Roosevelt faced either but he still had a deep hatred for big business. Jeffersons opposition to big business was founded in his agrarian ideals and the fear that big business and urbanites would fuel revolution. Even though they varied in degree, all three policies aimed for the well being of the people by attempting to destroy the corruption of the peoples government by monopolies. Ideals of reform were found in the Progressive, Jeffersonian, and Jacksonian types of government. They called for a large social reform to benefit the common people and ensure the role of government for the public good. Jefferson however just used the guise of reform to get his own people into office through the Spoils system as opposed to the Progressives who called for real reform. The Progressive movement led the nation in the right direction in regard to social and political reform. Even though Jeffersonians, Jacksonians, and Progressives all claimed to be reformists for the...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Guidelines Assessment Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Guidelines Assessment - Research Paper Example Modern clinical practice guidelines are often evaluated using the GLIA system (GuideLine Implementability Appraisal) and the AGREE instrument (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation). The availability of these systems is evidence of how carefully regulated these guidelines are and how they can be particularly useful in clinical situations (Field et al., 1990). The principal steps in developing a clinical practice guideline are as follows. In the first instance, the correct information needs to be identified and this should be the most current and most relevant data available concerning the diagnosis, treatment and management of the illness in question. Information should also be gathered about the cost and risk of the above, where applicable (Davis & Taylor-Vaisey, 1997). Having put all this data in place, it is then necessary to condense the information to provide it in a format readily available to clinicians (Michie & Johnston, 2004) and condense this into a format us eable in practical situations. Then, clinicians must implement the guidelines (Davis & Taylor-Vaisey, 1997), although this has been found to be difficult in many cases (Cabana et al., 1999; Michie & Lester, 2005). Clinical practice guidelines can involve computer algorithms, and their formulation can be heavily reliant on information technology (Field et al., 1990). The purpose of the AGREE instrument is to stress that the usefulness of these clinical practice guidelines is proportional to the quality of the guidelines themselves. This means that the AGREE instrument is primarily concerned with providing a framework with which to assess these guidelines, and states that it will: Assess the quality of guidelines; Provide a methodological strategy for the development of guidelines; and Inform what information and how information ought to be reported in guidelines. (AGREE Next Steps Consortium, 2009) This is taken from the newest version of the AGREE instrument, which is currently vers ion two. As is evidenced by these statements, the AGREE instrument aims to ensure that all guidelines will beneficial to both clinicians and patients. Clinical practice guidelines should provide the very best and most recent research to clinicians so that treatment, diagnosis and management of the illness in question is of the best standard possible. The AGREE instrument also ensures that clinical practice guidelines are formulated in a methodical way, and so all clinical practice guidelines formulated using this tool will be of the same standard and format, and thus the AGREE instrument is now a reliable quality evaluation tool. The AGREE instrument separates the information it provides into domains. The first domain is known as ‘scope and purpose’, which basically ensures that the basic properties of the guideline are adequately described, such as the target audience, the health questions and the objectives. The second domain is ‘stakeholder involvement’ which suggests that the discussion of the guideline involves professionals from every available and appropriate area, and that the target audience have also been consulted also. The third domain is defined as ‘rigour of development’ and essentially aims to ensure that all the evidence has been selected in an appropriate manner and that this is described in the guideline, that the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence are recognized, and that the guideline explicitly references this evidence. It also aims to provide information on how to update the procedure when necessary. The fourth domain is ‘clarity of presentation’ and aims to ensure th